PRISM: Practical Impact Assessment Methods for Small and Medium-sized Conservation Projects

The strategies and objectives of conservation projects are varied. As well as positive impacts on biodiversity (reflected in the population size, trends or distribution of species, extent or quality of habitat, and/or reductions in threats), they may include changing attitudes and behaviours, influencing policy and decision-making, raising awareness, building capacity or improving livelihoods and wellbeing. Much conservation is undertaken through small- and medium-scale grants and projects.

Monitoring the impacts of such efforts creates particular challenges, and as a result it is often difficult to determine their impact, even though this is critical to an organisation’s ability to:

  • Demonstrate effectiveness and so access continued funding
  • Learn from experience and develop and apply good practice and approaches that work
  • Share experiences to benefit the global community
  • Carry out evidence-based conservation interventions, policy and advocacy

There exists considerable experience of methods for impact assessment among CCI and other conservation organisations. However, many CCI organisations are struggling to effectively monitor impacts of SMCPs in a simple, yet scientifically credible manner because of insufficient guidance for less resource-intensive approaches. Yet donors are increasingly looking for more evidence-based impacts of the projects they fund.

This project will bring together academics and conservation practitioners, working across a range of disciplines (social and natural sciences, policy, education and awareness), together with relevant donors to review and evaluate experience, identify good practice and develop guidance suited to the challenges. The purpose of this project is to develop tools and guidance to improve the way in which conservation practitioners assess the impacts of small-medium budget conservation projects (SMCPs), and so contribute to an improvement in evidence-based conservation delivery, efficiency and effectiveness in the long-term.

This project is funded by the CCI Collaborative Fund for Conservation

Project Aims

This project aims to identify methods and develop guidance for assessing the impacts of conservation projects, focussing in particular on methods that:

  • Are simple and proportional (cost-wise)
  • Do not require high-levels of expertise
  • Produce scientifically robust results
  • Balance the gains from learning about single interventions against the demands of evaluating the entire project
  • Are informative and explanatory for managers and decision-makers
  • Are not necessarily dependent on a prior baseline assessment

The project will examine outcomes relating to:

  • Biodiversity
  • Livelihoods and wellbeing
  • Capacity (of institutions and individuals)
  • Awareness, attitudes and behaviours
  • Policy and decision-making

Key Activities

The project will:

  • Collate existing material for assessing different types of conservation impacts relevant for small-medium-sized conservation projects;
  • Review requirements and methods used by grantees for reporting impacts;
  • Evaluate existing approaches, identifying strengths/weaknesses and key gaps in terms of simple low-cost methods;
  • Host an expert workshop and identify the range of relevant approaches for monitoring and impact assessment;
  • Develop content of a guidance manual and pilot it across up to eight projects
  • Revise guidance based on user-feedback;

 

Conservation Impact

Conservation organisations are able to effectively measure the impacts of small-medium projects in a simple, yet scientifically credible way. Thus being able to draw on and share experiences of what works and what doesn’t work and to contribute to an improvement in evidence-based conservation delivery, efficiency and effectiveness in the long-term.

Outputs

  • A CCI-branded downloadable guidance manual of methods targeting small-medium sized conservation projects.
  • Up to eight field projects that have used the methods to assess their impact
  • Increased capacity for monitoring impacts of projects across CCI partner organisations
  • A review of impact assessment methods for small-medium sized conservation projects and of the pilot impact assessments
Project Overview
  • Funded Projects

  • Indicators, monitoring and effectiveness

  • 01/10/2015

  • Complete

Project Lead
Jenny Merriman

Jenny Merriman

Senior Ecosystem Services Officer, BirdLife International

Project Team

Dr James Pearce-Higgins

Dr James Pearce-Higgins

Director of Science, BTO

Dr David Thomas

Dr David Thomas

Programme Director, Endangered Landscapes & Seascapes Programme

Professor Bill Sutherland

Professor Bill Sutherland

Former member of CCI Council, Director of Research, Conservation Science Group, Zoology Department, University of Cambridge

Dr Stuart Butchart

Dr Stuart Butchart

Chief Scientist, BirdLife International

Dr Rosie Trevelyan

Dr Rosie Trevelyan

Director, Tropical Biology Association

Robert Munroe

Robert Munroe

Senior Programme Officer, Conventions and Policy Support, UNEP-WCMC

Dr Rebecca Jefferson

Dr Rebecca Jefferson

Senior Conservation Scientist, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB)

Victoria Dauncey

Victoria Dauncey

Programme Manager, Conservation Science and Design, Fauna & Flora International

Joelene Hughes

Joelene Hughes

Senior Conservation Scientist, RSPB

Iain Dickson

Iain Dickson

Impact Evaluation Officer, BirdLife International

CCI Partners Involved